The Policy Group on Tradeswomen's Issues (PGTI) is a collaboration of individuals from a variety of disciplines committed to increasing women in the construction trades. PGTI leverages the diversity of members' professions to gain greater insight into how to best push enforcement of policies set forth to increase career women in the trades. Content on this blog is submitted through PGTI members and collaborators.
Showing posts with label archives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label archives. Show all posts
Thursday, July 19, 2012
July Organization to Watch: Tradeswomen Archives: A growing community-building collection of tradeswomen resources FROM tradeswomen
Tradeswomen Archives is a project that uses innovative approaches for the collection of digital and paper materials to build community resources by and from women who work in non-traditional blue-collar jobs. In order to document our lives, Tradeswomen Archives has set up an interactive Facebook page and a website for women to upload their stories and images as well as inviting people to send in traditional hard copy materials. The idea behind the project is that women have made history by breaking into non-traditional jobs and we don't want to lose it!
This is a tool for building the community of women in the trades, in longshore, and other male-dominated blue collar jobs, and a resource for activists, researchers, and teachers. Started by four tradeswomen in 2007, the collection houses the personal papers of Vivian Price, Jane Templin, Pat Williams, Lynn Shaw, and many photos, interviews, videos, and flyers from tradeswomen and tradeswomen groups. There are international materials in the collection as well as sources from the US.
Please contact Vivian Price vprice@csudh.edu if you have ideas and comments about building the archives, or if you want to donate to the collection, which is housed at California State University Dominguez Hills.
Tradeswomen Archives http://www.tradeswomenarchives.com
Tradeswomen Archives Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/Tradeswomen-Archives/182586774318
Labels:
archives,
california,
herstory,
international,
Price,
retention,
Shaw,
Templin,
tradeswomen,
USA,
Williams,
women
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Construction class builds esteem, better-paying careers for low-income women
Construction class builds esteem, better-paying careers for low-income women
By Petula Dvorak

Tuesday, June 1, 2010; B01
Jackelyne Aguilera has had enough of hair, she told me, putting the safety goggles on her head and brushing off the sawdust in her braid. For years, she's worked in a beauty salon, on her feet all day long, endless hours, chattering customers, body aches and for what?
"Maybe $300 a week. That's what I make. Even as a manager," she said before leaning back down to tackle the chisel and door hinge she is learning to mount. "These men who do this work? They make $1,000 a week. I can do that."
It's Saturday morning, and Aguilera, 29, is among a half-dozen women who are working hard in a basement classroom, ready to switch careers to something more lucrative and less traditional.
There's a housekeeper, a couple of nannies, a lab tech and the beautician. Their Langley Park classroom looks like Bob the Builder's dream -- a row of half a dozen faux doorways, another row of toilets, an entire wall of exposed wires and circuit breakers and hanging sockets. There are alcoves waiting for tile.
Migdalia Pavilla, who is 63, swings her knee up to steady the baseboard she is sawing, so she can get that tricky angle so elusive to us do-it-yourselfers.
"It's really not that hard once someone shows you how to do it," she said.
In their nine-week course, they will learn the basics of plumbing, electrical, carpentry, flooring, drywall and tile work.
And what's surprising is how unexpected this still seems seven decades after Rosie the Riveter's star turn during World War II. We're still not used to seeing the carefully plucked eyebrows behind the safety goggles, the dainty pink blouses fluttering in the blowback of a circular saw.
But it makes sound economic sense for low-income women to begin pushing their way into this world. For the most part, this class of women cleans houses, watches kids and waits tables. Anyone who has spent time doing any of those jobs knows two things: It's hard work, and the pay bites.
And yet this is where most nonprofessional women stay, hovering near poverty, often trying to support their children on their own.
Ninety-nine percent of roofers, who make an average of $16.17 an hour, are men. Meanwhile, 98 percent of preschool teachers are women, and that job gets them $11.48 an hour, according to a report on job training for low-income women released this month by the Women's Economic Security Campaign.
Roofing is intense work, for sure. But have you ever spent a day with 25 preschoolers?
And although women have made huge strides in other traditionally male-dominated jobs, from doctors to lawyers to the physically demanding work of firefighters and police officers, construction work is still, oddly, manville.
"Oh, yeah -- when I get on a job, men give me a hard time," said Janaina Rocha, who has been in construction and management for a decade. She's a 36-year-old mother of four, a Brazilian immigrant whose dark, curly hair is sprouting with carpentry pencils and whose command of a hammer is impressive. I wouldn't mess with her for anything.
"They give me a hard time when I get there, but I just ignore it and let my work speak for itself," she tells me before darting over to stop two of her carpentry students from mangling a door.
"The wood has knots in it. Don't hit the knot. It'll crack the whole thing, and you don't want that," she told them.
She is an instructor at the CASA of Maryland construction training program, and she's constantly having to reassure her female students that they are capable of doing this work. "I tell them it's not about how much you can carry, but how you carry it," she said.
The program, which is sponsored by the Washington Area Women's Foundation, is aggressive about sending women into the higher-paying male-dominated fields. Women who take part in the vocational training are not allowed to turn down lawn care or snow shoveling jobs to wait for housekeeping gigs.
"Once they undertake one of these jobs, they begin to realize that they are capable of handling work they would never have previously considered," said Tona Cravioto, senior manager for vocational training and workforce development at the CASA Prince George's County Workers' Center.
The program demonstrated its effectiveness during the winter's huge snowstorms, when CASA found temporary snowplow jobs for 43 women, who made $15 to $25 an hour.
And thanks to similar programs, more government construction work -- especially for jobs related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -- is going to women. I've seen at least two all-female work crews on federal property in the District, one at the Old Executive Office Building and the other at the Library of Congress.
Hanging a door? Installing a toilet? Operating big machinery?
Mercedes Rodriguez, 43, has cleaned houses and watched children but never imagined she would do what she calls "man's work" like this.
But five weeks into her course, she's Paganini on the DeWalt.
"It's not so physical, this work," she tells me. "Now I see it's all up here," she said, pointing to her head.
E-mail me at dvorakp@washpost.com.
Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/31/AR2010053102813.html?hpid=artslot
By Petula Dvorak
Tuesday, June 1, 2010; B01
Jackelyne Aguilera has had enough of hair, she told me, putting the safety goggles on her head and brushing off the sawdust in her braid. For years, she's worked in a beauty salon, on her feet all day long, endless hours, chattering customers, body aches and for what?
"Maybe $300 a week. That's what I make. Even as a manager," she said before leaning back down to tackle the chisel and door hinge she is learning to mount. "These men who do this work? They make $1,000 a week. I can do that."
It's Saturday morning, and Aguilera, 29, is among a half-dozen women who are working hard in a basement classroom, ready to switch careers to something more lucrative and less traditional.
There's a housekeeper, a couple of nannies, a lab tech and the beautician. Their Langley Park classroom looks like Bob the Builder's dream -- a row of half a dozen faux doorways, another row of toilets, an entire wall of exposed wires and circuit breakers and hanging sockets. There are alcoves waiting for tile.
Migdalia Pavilla, who is 63, swings her knee up to steady the baseboard she is sawing, so she can get that tricky angle so elusive to us do-it-yourselfers.
"It's really not that hard once someone shows you how to do it," she said.
In their nine-week course, they will learn the basics of plumbing, electrical, carpentry, flooring, drywall and tile work.
And what's surprising is how unexpected this still seems seven decades after Rosie the Riveter's star turn during World War II. We're still not used to seeing the carefully plucked eyebrows behind the safety goggles, the dainty pink blouses fluttering in the blowback of a circular saw.
But it makes sound economic sense for low-income women to begin pushing their way into this world. For the most part, this class of women cleans houses, watches kids and waits tables. Anyone who has spent time doing any of those jobs knows two things: It's hard work, and the pay bites.
And yet this is where most nonprofessional women stay, hovering near poverty, often trying to support their children on their own.
Ninety-nine percent of roofers, who make an average of $16.17 an hour, are men. Meanwhile, 98 percent of preschool teachers are women, and that job gets them $11.48 an hour, according to a report on job training for low-income women released this month by the Women's Economic Security Campaign.
Roofing is intense work, for sure. But have you ever spent a day with 25 preschoolers?
And although women have made huge strides in other traditionally male-dominated jobs, from doctors to lawyers to the physically demanding work of firefighters and police officers, construction work is still, oddly, manville.
"Oh, yeah -- when I get on a job, men give me a hard time," said Janaina Rocha, who has been in construction and management for a decade. She's a 36-year-old mother of four, a Brazilian immigrant whose dark, curly hair is sprouting with carpentry pencils and whose command of a hammer is impressive. I wouldn't mess with her for anything.
"They give me a hard time when I get there, but I just ignore it and let my work speak for itself," she tells me before darting over to stop two of her carpentry students from mangling a door.
"The wood has knots in it. Don't hit the knot. It'll crack the whole thing, and you don't want that," she told them.
She is an instructor at the CASA of Maryland construction training program, and she's constantly having to reassure her female students that they are capable of doing this work. "I tell them it's not about how much you can carry, but how you carry it," she said.
The program, which is sponsored by the Washington Area Women's Foundation, is aggressive about sending women into the higher-paying male-dominated fields. Women who take part in the vocational training are not allowed to turn down lawn care or snow shoveling jobs to wait for housekeeping gigs.
"Once they undertake one of these jobs, they begin to realize that they are capable of handling work they would never have previously considered," said Tona Cravioto, senior manager for vocational training and workforce development at the CASA Prince George's County Workers' Center.
The program demonstrated its effectiveness during the winter's huge snowstorms, when CASA found temporary snowplow jobs for 43 women, who made $15 to $25 an hour.
And thanks to similar programs, more government construction work -- especially for jobs related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -- is going to women. I've seen at least two all-female work crews on federal property in the District, one at the Old Executive Office Building and the other at the Library of Congress.
Hanging a door? Installing a toilet? Operating big machinery?
Mercedes Rodriguez, 43, has cleaned houses and watched children but never imagined she would do what she calls "man's work" like this.
But five weeks into her course, she's Paganini on the DeWalt.
"It's not so physical, this work," she tells me. "Now I see it's all up here," she said, pointing to her head.
E-mail me at dvorakp@washpost.com.
Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/31/AR2010053102813.html?hpid=artslot
Labels:
anti-poverty,
apprenticeship,
archives,
CASA,
class,
low-income,
poverty,
women
Tuesday, November 25, 1986
WOMEN NOW LOOKING TO NEW JOBS IN CONSTRUCTION: [THIRD EDITION]
by Snyder, Sarah. Boston Globe (pre-1997 Fulltext) [Boston, Mass] 25 Nov 1986: 17.
Marie Barron, mother of two, makes $450 a week after taxes as a union carpenter. She used to be a telephone operator. It took having five brothers who are carpenters and a special federal program, eight years ago, to convince her to go into construction.
Boston city officials feel too many women miss out on high- paying construction jobs because they are brought up knowing nothing about them.
To correct that, the city is renewing a program killed for lack of funding five years ago called Women in the Building Trades. Women who want to learn about construction can go to a lecture on the different building trades, then take a free six-week course, two evenings a week and Saturdays, as preparation for a union apprenticeship. The first workshop, at the Women's Technical Institute on Boylston street, is Dec. 13.
Women hold an estimated 3 to 4 percent of the 13,000 construction jobs now in Boston. Union membership is about 5 percent; the Plumbers Union Local 12, for example, has eight female journeymen out of about 700 members. Local 103 of the Electrical Workers Union union has 62 women among 2,500 members.
Kristin McCormack, director of the Mayor's Office of Jobs and Community Services, said the new program will give women better access to "some of the best-paying jobs in Boston."
Some 100 women are expected to attend the program, with perhaps 30 going on to union membership.
The city is funding the program, sponsored by the Women's Technical Institute and Network of Women in the Trades, with $120,000 a year in federal community development block grants.
Susan Brophy, who headed the program for three years until its federal CETA funding was yanked in 1981, said it sent about 300 women statewide went into the building trades and was "enormously" successful. Women need an introduction to construction work that men do not, she said, "because of the way people grow up. Young men get used to using tools and doing those kinds of tasks with their fathers. It's not that women aren't capable, but . . .it was an industry that was unfamiliar to women."
Women electricians and carpenters at a press conference yesterday said they believe many women now working for the minimum wage of $3.55 an hour as clerks or cashiers would do well in the far higher- paying building trades.
"I went in knowing nothing," said Barron, the former telephone operator. "There is no certain skill you need first. The worst parts are getting up at 5:30 to start at 7, and the elements. But it's great in the summer; you're out at 3. In January and February, I usually go to the islands."
Construction workers typically lose 10 weeks of work a year because of weather. A journeyman plumber earns $19.75 an hour; Jill Feblowitz, one of the founders of Women in the Building Trades, earns $19.95 an hour as an electrician.
Between 1985 and 1986, the number of minorities working on major construction projects in Boston inceased from 5 to 16 percent, while the number of women rose only from 2 to 3 percent. Feblowitz thinks those relatively low numbers are due to "the traditional sex stereotype all of us grow up with -- I know I never thought I would be an electrician. Then there are information barriers, and no old boys' network. We hope this program fills those voids."
Attending the program does not guarantee a woman a union apprenticeship, but Boston Building Trades president Leo Purcell said, chances look "real good" for a woman who has gone through the program.
Sara Driscoll, an electrician with Local 103 who works from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. running pipe through ditches and installing fire alarm systems, said part of the reason there are few women in the unions is that some who begin an apprenticeship discover they simply don't like the work.
"They realize it is filthy, dangerous and hard," Driscoll said. Harassment by male workers, she said, "can be a problem, but it's not a major one." She praised her union's effort to recruit women in the past few years. For her first four years, until 1982, she never worked with another woman.
Flynn praised Boston's trade unions yesterday for their "progressive and cooperative leadership" in backing the women's program.
Copyright Boston Globe Newspaper Nov 25, 1986
Snyder, Sarah. "Women Now Looking to New Jobs in Construction." Boston Globe (pre-1997 Fulltext): 17. Boston Globe; Massachusetts Newsstand; ProQuest Central. Nov 25 1986. Web. 13 Jan. 2012 .
Thursday, December 31, 1981
'Woman On A Man's Job': The Story Of Cleveland Hard Hatted Women
Retrieved from http://www.cpcs.umb.edu/lrc/documents/35_1981_12_21_p5.pdf
by Member of Hard-Hatted Women,
Cleveland, Ohio (1981)
For the first time since the temporary
influx of women into "men's jobs" d u r -
ing World War 11, the women's move-
ment of the 60's and early 70's resulted
in programs that opened u p jobs tradi-
tionally reserved for men. Cleveland
Hard Hatted Women (HHW) and
similar groups around the country are
spontaneous outgrowths of the dilem-
mas encountered by women recently
entering these jobs.
Sharing our experiences in building
our group is important to us, as we
recognize that working people are all on
the defensive these days. We need the
solidarity and comraderie of mutual
support and information-sharing to
strengthen our collective position.
* * *
Imagine working every day a t a
physically intense, possibly dangerous,
always demanding job. Some co-
workers are hostile at first, your
foreman doesn't quite know what to do
with you, upper management wishes
you'd just dry up and disappear, there's
no place to go to the john.
Maybe you work out in public-on a
construction site, servicing phones or
computers, driving a truck. You're
around different people all the time,
most of whom don't hesitate to question
your competence, if not your motives:
"Check out that broad - a man
would've finished an hour agol" "Look
at that Women's Libber!"
These are some of the little
"pleasures" of being that modern-day
phenomenon - "woman on a man's
job." No wonder we get to feeling a little
oppressed sometimes. No wonder, after
hearing of a group in Pittsburgh, some
of us got together and formed Hard
Hatted Women. No wonder many more
women in non-traditional jobs have
since joined us.
Recently we took a sampling of some
of our feelings about HHW:
HHW has lightened the load on my
job. Knowing I'm not alone in the
special problems of non-traditional
work, and having emotional and prac-
tical support makes each working day
e a s i e r for me.-Geri Braun,
steelworker.
I look forward to monthly meetings
because I experience such a positive
affirmation of myself and m y job. It
counteracts the negativism I r u n into
on the job. The women I meet w i t h are
so gutsy and independent that I love
spending the time together in such
an energy-filled atmosphere.-Kathy
Augustine, computer technician.
I think the biggest change has been
increased participation in union af-
fairs and a more solid identification
with the hourly (non-supervisory) peo-
ple on m y job.-Fran Griffith, salt
miner.
We have a great opportunity to ex-
pose people, especially women, to
alternatives-new kinds of jobs
women can do, new ways of thinking.
Perhaps we can make a small dent in
traditional stereotypes limiting
women (and men) to certain roles and
jobs.-Mary Bugbee, payphone in-
staller.
Although the "support group" theme
has been its primary basis, HHW in two
years has grown intb a group capable of
training its members to function better
on their jobs as well as in other groups.
By taking on various responsibilities
(newsletter production, planning and
chairing meetings, developing
workshops, speaking to other groups),
many of us acquired skills and the con-
fidence we needed to become more ac-
tive in other areas.
In the past year, for example, several
women have gotten much more involved
in their unions. In union locals that are
predominantly male, an extra portion
of understanding and stamina is re-
quired to assume a respected place in
union life.
Many of us have become active in the
Coalition of Labor Union Women
(CLUW) where we are working on a
proposal for a n a t i o n a l CLUW
Taskforce on hard hatted women.
This fall we celebrated our heritage
by organizing a "Rosie the Riveter Re-
union" to honor Cleveland area women
who worked in the war industries during
the 40's. These women a r e our
foremothersl We met close to 100
"Rosies" and hosted about 30 of these
women and their guests at the reunion.
Another activity reflecting o u r
broader goals was a high school career
day that focused on alternative jobs for
women. Several of us gave workshops
demonstrating our job functions and sat
on a "What's My Line" panel. We were
able to answer many questions and
dispel an amazing number of fears
about how other women, boyfriends or
family might react to women in "men's
jobs," or how doing this type of work
might jeopardize one's "femininity."
Recently we appeared on a TV news
feature series, "The New Pioneers." As
a result of seeing a woman carpenter,
truck driver, and gas company con-
struction worker, over 20 new women
came to the next HHW meeting. It's
this type of outreach that's responsible
for the growth of our group.
In addition to reinforcing our
abilities to cope with our jobs and in-
fluencing other women along these
lines, we are entering a new phase of ac-
tivity. T h e Reagan administration's
policies pose a direct threat to our jobs.
Our livelihood is a direct outcome of the
openings created by the affirmative ac-
tion programs instituted in the
mid-70's. Affirmative action cutbacks
and the weakening of the EEOC have a
concentrated impact on our jobs and on
our goals as a group.
We are working with other groups,
like CLUW and Cleveland Women
Working (an office workers' group), and
exploring avenues for defending our
right to an equal place in the workforce.
Cleveland is currently entering a
period of heavy construction. Four new
multi-million dollar office towers will be
built. How can we help to convince the
contractors a n d the unions that women
deserve a share of these jobs, that
women need these jobs as much as any
other sector of the working population
and are equally capable of learning
these jobs?
If EEOC and Affirmative Action
should lose their power as formal incen-
tives for employers or legal safeguards
for women and minorities, what can we
do in the meantime to preserve and im-
prove our current status?
We hope to work with our unions and
other groups to address these concerns.
We want to make some more "dents" in
community awareness, as well as in
changing the life-chances for women
who need a decent wage and dignity on
the job as much as any other American
worker.
[For more information on Hard Hatted
Women, write or call Ma Bugbee ( H H W
Coordinator ) , 1 1 0 2 2 C r e s c e n t Rd.,
Cleveland, Ohio 441 11. Phone 216-476-2460.]
by Member of Hard-Hatted Women,
Cleveland, Ohio (1981)
For the first time since the temporary
influx of women into "men's jobs" d u r -
ing World War 11, the women's move-
ment of the 60's and early 70's resulted
in programs that opened u p jobs tradi-
tionally reserved for men. Cleveland
Hard Hatted Women (HHW) and
similar groups around the country are
spontaneous outgrowths of the dilem-
mas encountered by women recently
entering these jobs.
Sharing our experiences in building
our group is important to us, as we
recognize that working people are all on
the defensive these days. We need the
solidarity and comraderie of mutual
support and information-sharing to
strengthen our collective position.
* * *
Imagine working every day a t a
physically intense, possibly dangerous,
always demanding job. Some co-
workers are hostile at first, your
foreman doesn't quite know what to do
with you, upper management wishes
you'd just dry up and disappear, there's
no place to go to the john.
Maybe you work out in public-on a
construction site, servicing phones or
computers, driving a truck. You're
around different people all the time,
most of whom don't hesitate to question
your competence, if not your motives:
"Check out that broad - a man
would've finished an hour agol" "Look
at that Women's Libber!"
These are some of the little
"pleasures" of being that modern-day
phenomenon - "woman on a man's
job." No wonder we get to feeling a little
oppressed sometimes. No wonder, after
hearing of a group in Pittsburgh, some
of us got together and formed Hard
Hatted Women. No wonder many more
women in non-traditional jobs have
since joined us.
Recently we took a sampling of some
of our feelings about HHW:
HHW has lightened the load on my
job. Knowing I'm not alone in the
special problems of non-traditional
work, and having emotional and prac-
tical support makes each working day
e a s i e r for me.-Geri Braun,
steelworker.
I look forward to monthly meetings
because I experience such a positive
affirmation of myself and m y job. It
counteracts the negativism I r u n into
on the job. The women I meet w i t h are
so gutsy and independent that I love
spending the time together in such
an energy-filled atmosphere.-Kathy
Augustine, computer technician.
I think the biggest change has been
increased participation in union af-
fairs and a more solid identification
with the hourly (non-supervisory) peo-
ple on m y job.-Fran Griffith, salt
miner.
We have a great opportunity to ex-
pose people, especially women, to
alternatives-new kinds of jobs
women can do, new ways of thinking.
Perhaps we can make a small dent in
traditional stereotypes limiting
women (and men) to certain roles and
jobs.-Mary Bugbee, payphone in-
staller.
Although the "support group" theme
has been its primary basis, HHW in two
years has grown intb a group capable of
training its members to function better
on their jobs as well as in other groups.
By taking on various responsibilities
(newsletter production, planning and
chairing meetings, developing
workshops, speaking to other groups),
many of us acquired skills and the con-
fidence we needed to become more ac-
tive in other areas.
In the past year, for example, several
women have gotten much more involved
in their unions. In union locals that are
predominantly male, an extra portion
of understanding and stamina is re-
quired to assume a respected place in
union life.
Many of us have become active in the
Coalition of Labor Union Women
(CLUW) where we are working on a
proposal for a n a t i o n a l CLUW
Taskforce on hard hatted women.
This fall we celebrated our heritage
by organizing a "Rosie the Riveter Re-
union" to honor Cleveland area women
who worked in the war industries during
the 40's. These women a r e our
foremothersl We met close to 100
"Rosies" and hosted about 30 of these
women and their guests at the reunion.
Another activity reflecting o u r
broader goals was a high school career
day that focused on alternative jobs for
women. Several of us gave workshops
demonstrating our job functions and sat
on a "What's My Line" panel. We were
able to answer many questions and
dispel an amazing number of fears
about how other women, boyfriends or
family might react to women in "men's
jobs," or how doing this type of work
might jeopardize one's "femininity."
Recently we appeared on a TV news
feature series, "The New Pioneers." As
a result of seeing a woman carpenter,
truck driver, and gas company con-
struction worker, over 20 new women
came to the next HHW meeting. It's
this type of outreach that's responsible
for the growth of our group.
In addition to reinforcing our
abilities to cope with our jobs and in-
fluencing other women along these
lines, we are entering a new phase of ac-
tivity. T h e Reagan administration's
policies pose a direct threat to our jobs.
Our livelihood is a direct outcome of the
openings created by the affirmative ac-
tion programs instituted in the
mid-70's. Affirmative action cutbacks
and the weakening of the EEOC have a
concentrated impact on our jobs and on
our goals as a group.
We are working with other groups,
like CLUW and Cleveland Women
Working (an office workers' group), and
exploring avenues for defending our
right to an equal place in the workforce.
Cleveland is currently entering a
period of heavy construction. Four new
multi-million dollar office towers will be
built. How can we help to convince the
contractors a n d the unions that women
deserve a share of these jobs, that
women need these jobs as much as any
other sector of the working population
and are equally capable of learning
these jobs?
If EEOC and Affirmative Action
should lose their power as formal incen-
tives for employers or legal safeguards
for women and minorities, what can we
do in the meantime to preserve and im-
prove our current status?
We hope to work with our unions and
other groups to address these concerns.
We want to make some more "dents" in
community awareness, as well as in
changing the life-chances for women
who need a decent wage and dignity on
the job as much as any other American
worker.
[For more information on Hard Hatted
Women, write or call Ma Bugbee ( H H W
Coordinator ) , 1 1 0 2 2 C r e s c e n t Rd.,
Cleveland, Ohio 441 11. Phone 216-476-2460.]
Labels:
1981,
archives,
Hard Hatted Women,
tradeswomen,
women
Tuesday, August 23, 1977
Women Win Fight for More Construction Jobs, Less Harassment
By GEORGIA DULLEA. New York Times (1923-Current file) [New York, N.Y] 23 Aug 1977: 53.
Title
Women Win Fight for More Construction Jobs, Less Harassment
Topic heading
NYT Index summary
Georgia Dullea article on jobs for women in construction trades; cites harassment of women by male co-workers, and occasional violence; notes recent Labor Dept regulations against bias; reprs of women groups and contractors comment; illus (L)
First page
53
Print location
page 30, column 1
Publication year
1977
Section
Travel - Accent on The Sun
Place of publication
New York, N.Y.
Country of publication
United States
ISSN
03624331
Document type
article
ProQuest document ID
123417197
Document URL
http://0-search.proquest.com.ilsprod.lib.neu.edu/docview/123417197?accountid=12826
Copyright
Copyright New York Times Company Aug 23, 1977
Database
ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The New York Times (1851-2007) with Index (1851-1993)
Click here to see the PDF version of the article
Click here to see the PDF version of the article
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
