Wednesday, November 17, 2010

List of 1500 worst OSHA violators

OSHA published a list of the 1,500 worst violators of US Health and Safety Laws.  Attached is the link and the database. 
Many of these violators are bad actors in other arenas.

Description of who is on the list:
The employers are those whose establishments are covered by Federal OSHA and reported the highest "Days Away from work, Restricted work or job Transfer injury and illness" (DART) rate to OSHA in a survey of 2008 injury and illness data. For every 100 full-time workers, the 15,000 employers had 4.5 or more injuries or illnesses which resulted in days away from work, restricted work or job transfer. The national average is 2.0.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Construction class builds esteem, better-paying careers for low-income women

Construction class builds esteem, better-paying careers for low-income women


By Petula Dvorak






Tuesday, June 1, 2010; B01



Jackelyne Aguilera has had enough of hair, she told me, putting the safety goggles on her head and brushing off the sawdust in her braid. For years, she's worked in a beauty salon, on her feet all day long, endless hours, chattering customers, body aches and for what?

"Maybe $300 a week. That's what I make. Even as a manager," she said before leaning back down to tackle the chisel and door hinge she is learning to mount. "These men who do this work? They make $1,000 a week. I can do that."

It's Saturday morning, and Aguilera, 29, is among a half-dozen women who are working hard in a basement classroom, ready to switch careers to something more lucrative and less traditional.

There's a housekeeper, a couple of nannies, a lab tech and the beautician. Their Langley Park classroom looks like Bob the Builder's dream -- a row of half a dozen faux doorways, another row of toilets, an entire wall of exposed wires and circuit breakers and hanging sockets. There are alcoves waiting for tile.

Migdalia Pavilla, who is 63, swings her knee up to steady the baseboard she is sawing, so she can get that tricky angle so elusive to us do-it-yourselfers.

"It's really not that hard once someone shows you how to do it," she said.
In their nine-week course, they will learn the basics of plumbing, electrical, carpentry, flooring, drywall and tile work.

And what's surprising is how unexpected this still seems seven decades after Rosie the Riveter's star turn during World War II. We're still not used to seeing the carefully plucked eyebrows behind the safety goggles, the dainty pink blouses fluttering in the blowback of a circular saw.

But it makes sound economic sense for low-income women to begin pushing their way into this world. For the most part, this class of women cleans houses, watches kids and waits tables. Anyone who has spent time doing any of those jobs knows two things: It's hard work, and the pay bites.

And yet this is where most nonprofessional women stay, hovering near poverty, often trying to support their children on their own.

Ninety-nine percent of roofers, who make an average of $16.17 an hour, are men. Meanwhile, 98 percent of preschool teachers are women, and that job gets them $11.48 an hour, according to a report on job training for low-income women released this month by the Women's Economic Security Campaign.
Roofing is intense work, for sure. But have you ever spent a day with 25 preschoolers?

And although women have made huge strides in other traditionally male-dominated jobs, from doctors to lawyers to the physically demanding work of firefighters and police officers, construction work is still, oddly, manville.

"Oh, yeah -- when I get on a job, men give me a hard time," said Janaina Rocha, who has been in construction and management for a decade. She's a 36-year-old mother of four, a Brazilian immigrant whose dark, curly hair is sprouting with carpentry pencils and whose command of a hammer is impressive. I wouldn't mess with her for anything.

"They give me a hard time when I get there, but I just ignore it and let my work speak for itself," she tells me before darting over to stop two of her carpentry students from mangling a door.

"The wood has knots in it. Don't hit the knot. It'll crack the whole thing, and you don't want that," she told them.

She is an instructor at the CASA of Maryland construction training program, and she's constantly having to reassure her female students that they are capable of doing this work. "I tell them it's not about how much you can carry, but how you carry it," she said.

The program, which is sponsored by the Washington Area Women's Foundation, is aggressive about sending women into the higher-paying male-dominated fields. Women who take part in the vocational training are not allowed to turn down lawn care or snow shoveling jobs to wait for housekeeping gigs.

"Once they undertake one of these jobs, they begin to realize that they are capable of handling work they would never have previously considered," said Tona Cravioto, senior manager for vocational training and workforce development at the CASA Prince George's County Workers' Center.

The program demonstrated its effectiveness during the winter's huge snowstorms, when CASA found temporary snowplow jobs for 43 women, who made $15 to $25 an hour.

And thanks to similar programs, more government construction work -- especially for jobs related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -- is going to women. I've seen at least two all-female work crews on federal property in the District, one at the Old Executive Office Building and the other at the Library of Congress.

Hanging a door? Installing a toilet? Operating big machinery?

Mercedes Rodriguez, 43, has cleaned houses and watched children but never imagined she would do what she calls "man's work" like this.

But five weeks into her course, she's Paganini on the DeWalt.

"It's not so physical, this work," she tells me. "Now I see it's all up here," she said, pointing to her head.


E-mail me at dvorakp@washpost.com.


Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/31/AR2010053102813.html?hpid=artslot

Tuesday, November 25, 1986

WOMEN NOW LOOKING TO NEW JOBS IN CONSTRUCTION: [THIRD EDITION]

by Snyder, SarahBoston Globe (pre-1997 Fulltext) [Boston, Mass] 25 Nov 1986: 17.
Marie Barron, mother of two, makes $450 a week after taxes as a union carpenter. She used to be a telephone operator. It took having five brothers who are carpenters and a special federal program, eight years ago, to convince her to go into construction.
Boston city officials feel too many women miss out on high- paying construction jobs because they are brought up knowing nothing about them.
To correct that, the city is renewing a program killed for lack of funding five years ago called Women in the Building Trades. Women who want to learn about construction can go to a lecture on the different building trades, then take a free six-week course, two evenings a week and Saturdays, as preparation for a union apprenticeship. The first workshop, at the Women's Technical Institute on Boylston street, is Dec. 13.
Women hold an estimated 3 to 4 percent of the 13,000 construction jobs now in Boston. Union membership is about 5 percent; the Plumbers Union Local 12, for example, has eight female journeymen out of about 700 members. Local 103 of the Electrical Workers Union union has 62 women among 2,500 members.
Kristin McCormack, director of the Mayor's Office of Jobs and Community Services, said the new program will give women better access to "some of the best-paying jobs in Boston."
Some 100 women are expected to attend the program, with perhaps 30 going on to union membership.
The city is funding the program, sponsored by the Women's Technical Institute and Network of Women in the Trades, with $120,000 a year in federal community development block grants.
Susan Brophy, who headed the program for three years until its federal CETA funding was yanked in 1981, said it sent about 300 women statewide went into the building trades and was "enormously" successful. Women need an introduction to construction work that men do not, she said, "because of the way people grow up. Young men get used to using tools and doing those kinds of tasks with their fathers. It's not that women aren't capable, but . . .it was an industry that was unfamiliar to women."
Women electricians and carpenters at a press conference yesterday said they believe many women now working for the minimum wage of $3.55 an hour as clerks or cashiers would do well in the far higher- paying building trades.
"I went in knowing nothing," said Barron, the former telephone operator. "There is no certain skill you need first. The worst parts are getting up at 5:30 to start at 7, and the elements. But it's great in the summer; you're out at 3. In January and February, I usually go to the islands."
Construction workers typically lose 10 weeks of work a year because of weather. A journeyman plumber earns $19.75 an hour; Jill Feblowitz, one of the founders of Women in the Building Trades, earns $19.95 an hour as an electrician.
Between 1985 and 1986, the number of minorities working on major construction projects in Boston inceased from 5 to 16 percent, while the number of women rose only from 2 to 3 percent. Feblowitz thinks those relatively low numbers are due to "the traditional sex stereotype all of us grow up with -- I know I never thought I would be an electrician. Then there are information barriers, and no old boys' network. We hope this program fills those voids."
Attending the program does not guarantee a woman a union apprenticeship, but Boston Building Trades president Leo Purcell said, chances look "real good" for a woman who has gone through the program.
Sara Driscoll, an electrician with Local 103 who works from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. running pipe through ditches and installing fire alarm systems, said part of the reason there are few women in the unions is that some who begin an apprenticeship discover they simply don't like the work.
"They realize it is filthy, dangerous and hard," Driscoll said. Harassment by male workers, she said, "can be a problem, but it's not a major one." She praised her union's effort to recruit women in the past few years. For her first four years, until 1982, she never worked with another woman.
Flynn praised Boston's trade unions yesterday for their "progressive and cooperative leadership" in backing the women's program.
Copyright Boston Globe Newspaper Nov 25, 1986

Snyder, Sarah. "Women Now Looking to New Jobs in Construction." Boston Globe (pre-1997 Fulltext): 17. Boston Globe; Massachusetts Newsstand; ProQuest Central. Nov 25 1986. Web. 13 Jan. 2012 .