Showing posts with label civil rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil rights. Show all posts

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Upcoming Event: Speaking with One Voice - Civil Rights Virtual Symposium

U.S. Department of Transportation Departmental Office of Civil Rights


Speaking with One Voice
Civil Rights Virtual Symposium 

for all DOT Employees and Stakeholders 
February 4-6, 2014 

Registration now open

Broadening Perspectives 

Fifty years after the passing of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, and twenty years after Executive Order 12898, directing Federal agencies to address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-Income Populations, civil rights continue to be a responsibility of every Federal employee and external stakeholder. Experts from across government will be speaking on current, forward-moving topics, broadening participants' perspectives on how civil rights are integral to the DOT mission and the everyday workplace

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Repost: Meet Janette Wipper, OFCCP's New Pacific Regional Director

Dear Colleagues,

Today, I am pleased to welcome Janette Wipper to OFCCP as our new Regional Director for the Pacific.

Janette (starts out like “just” not “January”) comes to OFCCP from Sanford Heisler, a national civil rights law firm. During her seven-year tenure there, she litigated complex class action lawsuits on behalf of workers facing discrimination, misclassification and wage theft. In 2010 she was tapped to serve as Managing Partner, overseeing the establishment and expansion of Sanford Heisler’s San Francisco office.

At the firm, Janette served as lead advisor and consultant on the use of statistical evidence and experts in numerous class action cases. Among her many significant victories is the landmark Novartis lawsuit in which the pharmaceutical giant had to pay $250 million for discriminating against 5,600 female sales representatives in pay, promotion and because of pregnancy. That is the largest jury award for workers in a class action sex discrimination case ever. And Janette played a crucial role in the victory by uncovering flaws in the analysis used by a key expert for the defense. For her efforts on the Novartis case, she was named one of Law360’s rising stars in March of 2013.

Prior to joining Sanford, Janette practiced civil rights impact litigation at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the NAACP and New York Lawyers for the Public Interest. Throughout her career, she has been a champion for social and environmental justice on behalf of low-wage workers, women and communities of color. A native of Brooklyn, New York, Janette received a B.A. from The University of Texas at Austin and a J.D. from Vermont Law School. In between acquiring these two degrees, she worked as field coordinator in Ecuador, advocating on behalf of indigenous communities affected by oil contamination in the Amazon. She lives in San Francisco with her husband and five-year-old daughter.

As the head of OFCCP’s Pacific operations, Janette will oversee more than 100 staff working 12 offices and responsible for enforcement across 11 states and territories. The Pacific is one of the largest and most diverse regions in our agency, and, over the past year, staff in the region were responsible for negotiating more than $2.2 million in back wages and 933 job offers on behalf of 3,685 workers affected by discrimination – the largest remedies in the nation.

I am thrilled to welcome Janette to OFCCP and am confident that she will be a terrific addition to our team! I know you will agree.

Pat

Friday, July 12, 2013

Repost: OFCCP Director Shiu Addresses 2013 Annual Convention - The Summit For Workers' Rights

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP)

NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
2013 ANNUAL CONVENTION: THE SUMMIT FOR WORKERS' RIGHTS

PREPARED REMARKS BY PATRICIA A. SHIU, DIRECTOR
U.S. Department Of Labor – Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs

Thursday, June 27, 2013
Sheraton Downtown Hotel – Denver, Colorado


Good afternoon. And thank you, Teri, for that kind introduction.

It's good to be here. It’s good to be among friends.

I don't have to tell you that we’ve had a rough few days, full of some pretty big setbacks when it comes to defending workers' rights. But the way I see it, after a week like this one, those of us who toil in the pursuit of civil rights and civil liberties have two options:

Either we can curl up in the fetal position and hide under the covers;

Or, we can come to Denver, meet up with 500 like-minded colleagues and start plotting the next great chapter in the history of workers' rights.

I choose the second option. And I know you do, too!

Of course, the news isn't all bad. Yesterday, our nation took a huge step forward on the issue of marriage equality, a seemingly inevitable – but once inconceivable – outcome to cases that have been working their way up through the courts for years.

I join President Obama and my colleagues throughout the administration in applauding the Supreme Court's decision to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act on constitutional grounds. And, as a Californian, I look forward to a lifetime of attending gay and lesbian weddings.

The truth is that our civil society can feel... a bit "Dickensian" these days:

It is the best of times. It is the worst of times.
It is the age of wisdom. It is the age of foolishness.
It is the epoch of Ginsburg... yeah, let’s just leave it at that.

In other words, it's a mixed bag.

But you know what gives me hope right now? A Texas State Senator named Wendy Davis.

She gives me hope.

The daughter of a single mom from Fort Worth Texas, Senator Davis became pregnant at age 19 and a single mom, herself. Undeterred by her circumstances, she enrolled in a local college, transferred to a university and became the first college graduate in her family. She went on to Harvard Law School and, eventually, a career in public service.

Two days ago, 50-year-old Wendy Davis, stood on the floor of the Texas State Senate. She stood for almost 13 hours. She stood without water. She stood without a bathroom break. She stood and she stood and she talked and she talked...

She spoke about the responsibility of government to protect women’s health and our reproductive rights. And – with a little help from her friends – she managed to stand just long enough to help run out the clock on a special session of the Texas legislature. Through her filibuster, the gentlewoman from Fort Worth helped defeat one of the most restrictive anti-abortion bills in the state’s history.

I salute Senator Wendy Davis. I salute her heroism and her advocacy on behalf of countless Texas women.

And I stand with her. On principle.

But here's the thing about standing on principle: Like Senator Davis, you have to remain standing.

You have to stay vigilant.

The only way to safeguard the hard-won civil rights of the 20th century is to fight like hell for them in the 21st century.

That's what I’ve learned this week.

And, in case it helps, I was reminded by a colleague at the EEOC that we have lived through these kinds of setbacks before. And time and time again, we’ve been able to overcome them.

Just a few years ago, a trilogy of court rulings – including the Sutton case – narrowed rights for people with disabilities. Those cases, however, ended up giving birth to the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed by a Republican president.

Ledbetter vs. Goodyear effectively closed the courtroom doors to many victims of pay discrimination. That was until the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was passed by a Democratic Congress and signed by a Democratic president.

Remember that the work of forming a more perfect union is never finished. Two steps forward, three steps back, right?

I suppose it can sometimes feel that way.

But have you ever actually tried taking two steps forward and three steps back? I bet that if you keep doing it over and over again, your net trajectory will be forward.

You know why?

Because when we move backward, it is with hesitation and uncertainty. It doesn’t feel natural and our steps, therefore, will be smaller. But when we walk forward, we do so with confidence and surety. Out strides are bigger and we keep moving ahead.

That's how progress happens. Not in a moment, but in a movement.

My friends at NELA, you are a vital part of that movement. And I am incredibly honored to have counted myself among the leaders and advocates of this fine organization. So, thank you for inviting me to be a part of this gathering.

This year, the U.S. Department of Labor marks it centennial anniversary. And as we celebrate 100 years of making workplaces safer, fairer, more productive and more diverse, we are mindful that we do not do this work alone.

We are joined at the federal level by partners in sister agencies like the EEOC and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. Together, we are partnering and collaborating in new and unprecedented ways – sharing data, collaborating on cases, conducting joint trainings for our investigators, coordinating on litigation strategies, developing unified messages and establishing programs to educate workers on their rights.

President Obama called on us to come together in order to establish a unified civil rights agenda. And that is exactly what we are doing.

But the civil rights apparatus in the federal government is just one piece of a much larger tapestry, one that includes courageous workers, grassroots activists, social scientists, community leaders, elected officials and dedicated legal professionals like all of you.

The work you do is critically important to advancing civil rights. The cases you take on, the arguments you advance and the values you help to defend are inextricably linked to the enforcement actions of agencies like mine.

The Civil Rights Act, itself, contemplates a key role for private attorneys working in concert with government agencies like the EEOC, the Justice Department and the OFCCP. We are each critical legs of the same footstool.

Dr. King famously said that, "the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends towards justice."

There is a corollary to that. As President Obama likes to remind us, it "does not bend on its own. It bends because each of us, in our own way, put our hands on that arc. We bend it in the direction of justice."

That's the beauty of what you and I get to do every day. Long after a bill gets signed into law or the rallies in front of the courthouse dissipate, we are the ones charged with implementing the law, defending it and exercising its full potential.

I know this work is not easy. And often times we do it at great personal and professional costs. But we don’t do it seeking fame. And certainly not fortune. We make the sacrifices and do the hard work because we are stewards of America’s core values. We are the arc benders who make sure that every worker is afforded the full protections of the law.

I honor your courage. I honor your sacrifice. And we see countless examples of this work.

For every Susann Bashir fighting against religious persecution, thank God there is an Amy Coopman to stand with her.

When Leticia Zuniga Escamilla had to bear degrading sexual abuse at the hands of her supervisor she was all alone. But when she courageously fought back in court, she had Lisa Stratton by her side.

And when Sandra Knott had to battle cancer AND the California Department of Corrections, she had Jill Telfer battling right there with her.

This is what we do. These are the incredible workers for whom we fight. We bend the arc. We bend it for justice.

At the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, we have been in the arc bending business for quite a while now.

Our agency is the product of the great titans – folks like A. Philip Randolph, Dr. King and Dr. Dorothy Height. The OFCCP was established by Executive Order 11246, signed by President Lyndon Johnson about a month after the Voting Rights Act became law.

The idea was pretty simple: civil rights and voting rights have to be paired with workers’ rights. Real equality means we can’t allow whole populations to languish without opportunities to find good jobs, to sustain themselves, to support their families and to join the American middle class.

In the early 1970s, OFCCP’s authorities were expanded by the Nixon administration through Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act.

To put it simply, our job is to protect workers, to promote diversity and to enforce these three laws which prohibit federal contractors and subcontractors from discriminating in their employment practices. In addition, we hold the businesses we regulate to the fair and reasonable requirement that they take affirmative action to improve employment opportunities for women, minorities, people with disabilities and protected veterans.

In the nearly four years since President Obama asked me to lead the OFCCP, I have been clear that taxpayer dollars must never be used to discriminate.

And if private companies are going to profit from public dollars, then those companies have an obligation to provide equal employment opportunity and strive to build workforces which reflect the diversity of the people who fund them.

I am privileged to work with nearly 800 talented men and women in OFCCP offices all across the country. They are on the front lines of our efforts to combat discrimination and uphold affirmative action.

Together, we protect the civil rights of the nearly one quarter of American workers who are employed by – or seek jobs with – companies that do business with the federal government. Those companies receive lucrative government contracts to do everything from constructing our office buildings and laying our IT infrastructure to supplying food on our military bases and providing legal services for federal agencies.

To read the remainder of Shiu's speech, visit http://www.dol.gov/ofccp.

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Repost: Miss Utah’s Question is Worth Answering

by PATRICIA SHIU on JUNE 20, 2013

Marissa Powell’s comments on the pay gap at the June 16 Miss USA competition have gotten a lot of attention in the news – but for all the wrong reasons.

Gossip sites and even respectable media sources have homed in on her grammatically shaky response, but let’s not duck the question; it is well worth answering again and again.

As judge NeNe Leakes acknowledged and as I’ve noted myself many times in this blog, there is a persistent wage gap in this country, despite the fact that women play an increasingly crucial economic role in America’s families. Leakes asked what the pay gap says about society, and I think it’s an important question. The fact that the pay gap has decreased over the past 50 years shows that our society is open to change – but the fact that it exists at all shows that change is slow and requires constant support.

Workers can take some responsibility by educating themselves about typical pay scales within their industries and the laws that apply to pay equality, particularly Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act, which was passed 50 years ago this month.

They should also know the federal agencies that are available to assist with education and enforcement, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as well as the Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, which I lead, and its Women’s Bureau. We are constantly updating the department’s equal pay website to ensure that women have the tools and resources they need to level the playing field.

While Ms. Powell’s shaky response reflected the stress of responding to an unexpected question in a public forum, her clarification the next day got right to the heart of the issue: “This is not OK. It needs to be equal pay for equal work; and it’s hard enough already to earn a living, and it shouldn’t be harder just because you’re a woman.”

With her response Sunday night, Ms. Powell inadvertently drew more attention to this important question than she could have with a straight answer. That’s one small flub for a woman, one giant meme for womankind. And it’s a conversation we can all benefit from. After all, the pay gap costs individual women thousands of dollars in lost pay every year – and hundreds of thousands across their working lifetimes.

Closing the pay gap has deeply personal repercussions for women around the nation, but it has even greater resonance for society at large. Equality has long been one of cornerstones of our national culture, and its benefits are widespread.

As the president said on the 50th anniversary of the Equal Pay Act, closing the pay gap is “part of a broader agenda to create good jobs and to strengthen middle-class security, to keep rebuilding an economy that works for everybody, that gives every American the chance to get ahead, no matter who you are or what you look like, or what your last name is and who you love.”

Patricia Shiu is the director of the Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.

View the original article at http://social.dol.gov/blog.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Race-bias lawsuit against Walsh OKd as class-action


By: Micah Maidenberg April 16, 2012


In a 33-page ruling issued in late March, U.S. District Court Judge Joan Lefkow certified two classes of black Walsh employees who could be included in the lawsuit, potentially covering thousands of workers. A jury award in the case could be as high as $500 million if the workers prevail in the case, their lawyer estimates.(Crain's) — A dozen black workers employed by Walsh Group Ltd. have scored a big victory in a racial-discrimination suit against the Chicago-based construction company, with a federal judge allowing them to pursue their case as a class-action claim.
The ruling is a setback to Walsh, which had $3.4 billion in revenue in 2010, making it the largest contractor in the Chicago area, according to a 2011 Crain's list.

“The fact that she certified two of the claims gives the plaintiffs a real shot,” says Samuel Tenenbaum, an associate professor at Northwestern University School of Law. In class-action suits, the biggest hurdle for plaintiffs is often achieving class certification, he says. “A lot of this is very discretionary with the judge.”
Calls to Walsh were not returned. The company, which denies the discrimination allegations, had asked Judge Lefkow to deny class certification. Aimee Delaney, a partner at Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP in Chicago and the company's lead lawyer on the case, did not return calls seeking comment.